The governments of the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and the Netherlands have issued a joint statement announcing their conclusion that Russian opposition leader and freedom fighter Alexei Navalny was assassinated by Russia’s intelligence services using poison from an Ecuadorian dart frog.
In authoritarian systems, dissidents become structurally threatening when they intersect three domains: corruption exposure, protest mobilization, and international advocacy.
Navalny operated across all three; which increases perceived regime risk independent of his formal political viability.
Do you have any rrason to believe this "Old Europe" joint statement, especially as the competing theory is that Navalny's murder was a British operation designed to boost an ongoing smear campaign against Russia?
In authoritarian systems, dissidents become structurally threatening when they intersect three domains: corruption exposure, protest mobilization, and international advocacy.
Navalny operated across all three; which increases perceived regime risk independent of his formal political viability.
Do you have any rrason to believe this "Old Europe" joint statement, especially as the competing theory is that Navalny's murder was a British operation designed to boost an ongoing smear campaign against Russia?
Let's not fall for the Russiaphobic propaganda. Here's something worth a read: https://space4peace.blogspot.com/2020/09/navalny-poisoning-real-target-is.html