The author of the article claims to have heard audio of Steven Crowder admitting he told his wife he'd fuck her up.
Sorry, but it's gonna take better evidence than that to convince me.
Seems like a rather important part of the story. If the video/audio actually existed - I'd expect it to be included in the article rather than simply being alluded to in the article - and annotated in the video.
It's fascinating how you won't believe a video, won't believe the article, but will believe anything that exculpates your abusive idol.
Consider that Steven would be able to sue Yashar for defamation if Yashar were manufacturing this information, and consider that he has not and will not.
Consider that you are doing mental gymnastics trying to justify abuse.
If the "I'll fuck You up" part happened after he followed her into the house then it stands to reason it wouldn't have been caught on the outdoor patio ring camera. If there isn't video footage of him saying it, but there's some kind of evidence (given to the author of the article by her family as I understand it) of him admitting to & acknowledging that he said it, then how do you expect there to be footage of it? We don't always get to have all the evidence in situations. That's why in court as a juror for instance you're told to use your experience, your common sense, critical thinking, & logic to look at the evidence you do have & come to a decision. No one is suggesting solely from this 3 min clip that Steven is all evil & HC is "innocent" of any wrong doing. We're looking at a several minutes long clip (longer than viral clips of Karens being accused of racism that are taken at face value) & we're saying "this encounter, how he spoke to her & how he demeaned & belittled & gaslit her are indicative of emotional abuse. In that moment no matter what HC said beforehand Steven was being abusive. And those aren't tactics someone just starts using randomly. Ppl who use the tactics Steven used are skilled at using them...as he was. He was calm. She was showing signs of panic. That tells me she has seen this behavior before & was trying to appease him. It tells me he doesn't like to be challenged & will manipulate those around him to get what he wants. So whether or not they're both abusive isn't really the issue in this clip. Maybe she's just as bad. But it doesn't excuse what he did or said.
Where is the video of him saying he'd fuck her up? I missed it.
So you didnt read the article?
He admitted to what he said. Read the article dude.
The author of the article claims to have heard audio of Steven Crowder admitting he told his wife he'd fuck her up.
Sorry, but it's gonna take better evidence than that to convince me.
Seems like a rather important part of the story. If the video/audio actually existed - I'd expect it to be included in the article rather than simply being alluded to in the article - and annotated in the video.
It's fascinating how you won't believe a video, won't believe the article, but will believe anything that exculpates your abusive idol.
Consider that Steven would be able to sue Yashar for defamation if Yashar were manufacturing this information, and consider that he has not and will not.
Consider that you are doing mental gymnastics trying to justify abuse.
Consider what your mom would think of that.
If the "I'll fuck You up" part happened after he followed her into the house then it stands to reason it wouldn't have been caught on the outdoor patio ring camera. If there isn't video footage of him saying it, but there's some kind of evidence (given to the author of the article by her family as I understand it) of him admitting to & acknowledging that he said it, then how do you expect there to be footage of it? We don't always get to have all the evidence in situations. That's why in court as a juror for instance you're told to use your experience, your common sense, critical thinking, & logic to look at the evidence you do have & come to a decision. No one is suggesting solely from this 3 min clip that Steven is all evil & HC is "innocent" of any wrong doing. We're looking at a several minutes long clip (longer than viral clips of Karens being accused of racism that are taken at face value) & we're saying "this encounter, how he spoke to her & how he demeaned & belittled & gaslit her are indicative of emotional abuse. In that moment no matter what HC said beforehand Steven was being abusive. And those aren't tactics someone just starts using randomly. Ppl who use the tactics Steven used are skilled at using them...as he was. He was calm. She was showing signs of panic. That tells me she has seen this behavior before & was trying to appease him. It tells me he doesn't like to be challenged & will manipulate those around him to get what he wants. So whether or not they're both abusive isn't really the issue in this clip. Maybe she's just as bad. But it doesn't excuse what he did or said.